In the primary a part of this essay I requested a distinct query: what can we find out about nineteenth century geology by inspecting the “world views” of its most profitable practitioners? To make the query tractable (and enjoyable), I focused on two geologists, Charles Lyell and Eduard Suess. These have been the heavyweight champions of the interval, not less than within the area of normal idea. However historiographical opinion divides on the query of how Suess’s geology pertains to Lyell’s. Have been Lyell and Suess antagonists engaged in an intergenerational battle for the soul of geology? Or was Suess’s geology basically Lyellian regardless of some apparent (however within the final evaluation superficial) variations? The query has broad implications for our understanding of geological thought and apply, and for gauging the affect of Lyell on his speedy successors. Nevertheless it additionally holds the promise of illuminating one thing of the course that geological science traveled through the lengthy nineteenth century, and thus of offering our sought-after coordinating theme.
[Road map here]
There’s a cartoon model of the historical past of geology that goes like this. As soon as upon a time, superstition and credulity reigned. This was the late eighteenth century, the heyday of scientific “catastrophism” (a phrase William Whewell coined to distinction with “uniformitarianism”). The philosophy of catastrophism “was frankly supernatural” (Eiseley 1958, 114). “The world was not thought to be [having] all the time [been] formed by the forces of in the present day.” As a substitute, it was mentioned to have been repeatedly convulsed by paroxysms of divine authorship: these are the “catastrophes” of its identify. After every disaster, new types of life have been created to repopulate the globe. So mammals changed the good secondary reptiles, and man the stranger components of the tertiary fauna. The entire pageant had an charisma to it, as if the rule of legislation had been repeatedly and miraculously suspended within the historical past of the planet. Anyway, geologists had but to study Hume’s lesson that the proof for miracles by no means outweighs the proof in opposition to them. “I mustn’t imagine such a narrative have been it informed me by Cato”— this was a sentiment that was on nobody’s lips, not less than earlier than Hume’s buddy James Hutton got here round.
Hutton was an early gentle within the predawn of geology, a prophet of pure legislation. However his candle was virtually snuffed out earlier than Charles Lyell blew it right into a conflagration. With Lyell, geology lastly grew to become a science. “A era earlier than Darwin he took a world of cataclysms, supernatural violence, and thriller, and made from it one thing plain, anticipated, and pure” (Eiseley 1959, 98). By means of him, the rule of legislation overthrew the caprice of divine meddling. “If in the present day we glance upon our planet as acquainted even when its bowels shake and its volcanoes grumble, it’s as a result of Lyell taught us way back the easy powers within the earth.” Gradual, regular, predictable, easy: after Lyell, uniformitarianism was the order of the day. Even the validation of continental drift performed by its guidelines, because it was delayed by a number of many years till a vera causa of continental motion had been found in seafloor spreading.
Now soar ahead twenty years from the invention of seafloor spreading. Uniformitarianism nonetheless reigned, however it was starting to wobble. Neo-catastrophism was overseas and Lyell had grew to become a legal responsibility, not less than in sure circles. Catastrophic mass extinctions, big floods, continental infernos— all of those have been again on the menu, particularly after the Alvarez speculation crash landed in 1980 (Sepkoski 2021). Evidently, uniformitarian strictures wanted to be relaxed in sure circumstances; there was extra to the historic conduct of the earth than the working-out of its “easy powers.” Lyell’s regulative ideas had grow to be straight jackets, dogmas. To proceed to stick by them can be to face in the best way of geological progress. This was the chorus that issued from a number of quarters through the Eighties.
The chorus neatly packaged two mutually reinforcing claims. The primary was that the Lyellian revolution in geology was a whole victory for the forces of uniformitarianism, not less than within the area of methodological prescription. It is a easy extension of delusion that Lyell turned geology right into a science: for if Lyell’s venture was to make geology scientific and he succeeded, then in fact his victory was a complete one. Second, Lyellian uniformitarianism was imagined to have retained the whip hand for 100 years or extra. Why else would the neo-catastrophists of the Eighties blame Lyell for the failure of their self-discipline to grapple with the proof of catastrophes previously? This solely is smart if uniformitarian prescriptions have been a relentless function of geological apply since Lyell; that’s, if Lyell’s victory was each whole and enduring.
The above historical past is to not be taken severely, even supposing a curious variety of folks appear to imagine it. As historians have proven, almost each little bit of it’s fallacious, or in want of great qualification. Geology within the late eighteenth century was not an train in superstition. Definitely “catastrophism” was not supernatural in essence. (There are critical questions on whether or not any coherent custom may be made to reply to the identify “catastrophism.”) Hutton’s significance is overstated, as is Lyell’s. They have been main figures— this a lot is true. However easy tales of heroic genius conquering superstition are the stuff of homily relatively than historical past. Actual comprehension calls for that we do higher. Contemplate Lyell.